The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act, or the SECURE Act, as it’s better known, was signed into law in late December 2019, after months of congressional squabbling and revisions. Among other things, it has resulted in some of the most significant changes to the retirement plan distributions rules in decades. Additionally, the SECURE Act created various new incentives to encourage employers to create—and employees to contribute to—employer-sponsored retirement plans. It also made some minor modifications to various income tax provisions.
This article focuses on the provisions of the SECURE Act that will impact individuals, in particular those who are approaching retirement and those who have material retirement accounts balances that must be considered in the estate planning process.
Traditional Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) were created by the government to allow people who aren’t covered by an employer-sponsored retirement plan (such as a 401K) and those who are covered but with relatively low wages to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis.
Additionally, all individuals wishing to save on an after-tax basis can generally make non-deductible contributions to an IRA to achieve tax-deferred growth of their investments. Historically, the caveat to being able to contribute to an IRA was that the individual must have not attained age 70 ½ and they (or their spouse) must have sufficient earned income to match the contribution amount.
WHAT CHANGES: Starting in 2020, the age 70 ½ cap has been eliminated, meaning an individual of any age can now make IRA contributions. However, the earned income requirement and the income thresholds for deductibility of contributions remain in place.
To ensure that tax-deferred retirement accounts don’t go untaxed indefinitely, especially for wealthy taxpayers who have no financial need for the assets, the IRS put into place required minimum distribution (RMD) rules. Historically, these rules stated that account owners must begin withdrawing (and subjecting to income tax) a minimum amount out of the account each year starting at age 70 ½. Their first distribution could be delayed until April 1 of the year following the year that they turned 70 ½ if they wished, in order to achieve some income-tax efficiencies.
WHAT CHANGES: For individuals who attain age 70 ½ in 2020 and beyond, the age at which RMDs must be started has been extended to age 72. With people generally working later in life and living longer, this change will allow slightly longer tax-deferred growth of retirement savings and additional time to better manage the income tax aspects of their pre- and post-retirement income situation.
IRA and retirement account owners can designate the beneficiaries of any unused assets that remain in their accounts at the death of the owner. These designated beneficiaries can be spouses, children, other family members or individuals, and even trusts and charities. Historically, both spouse and non-spouse beneficiaries had the general freedom to take as much money out from the retirement account as they wanted or needed (albeit living with the income tax consequences of doing so). However, to maximize the tax-deferred growth of the inherited assets and to manage the tax impact of distributions, they were also permitted to take only a minimum amount of distributions over their remaining life expectancy, hence the “stretch.”
WHAT CHANGES: Retirement account beneficiaries, whose benefit comes when the original account owner’s death occurs after December 31, 2019, may now be limited in their ability to stretch distributions from their inherited accounts over their remaining life expectancy.
Many will be limited to a 10-year period at most. There are useful exceptions and aspects of the stretch elimination, however.
Retirement account assets can be a significant portion of an owner’s estate. When engaging in the estate planning process, people attempt to pass their remaining assets to heirs or charity in an income- and estate-tax-efficient manner, while protecting the assets from creditors, divorcing spouses, and from the spendthrift and poor investment choices of the account beneficiaries themselves. This is no different for retirement assets as it is for significant brokerage accounts.
Historically, where significant retirement account assets existed in an estate, planners often recommended the use of see-through trusts such as conduit trusts, or, less often, accumulation trusts. Generally speaking, a conduit trust would receive the retirement account assets at the death of the owner and the trustee would ensure that required minimum distributions were distributed to spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, while preserving the corpus of the retirement account assets for instances of extraordinary need, all while keeping a keen eye on income tax consequences for both the beneficiaries and the trust itself.
Additionally, placing the IRA in trust enabled the original account owner to essentially posthumously control subsequent beneficiaries of the assets, rather than leaving control to surviving spouses and children.
WHAT CHANGES: With the elimination of the stretch provision for most non-spouse beneficiaries, conduit trusts and their trustees will now be faced with difficult, uncertain choices with respect to distributions to non-spouse beneficiaries. As a result of the Act, there are seemingly no required distributions throughout the 10-year window—only one at the end. This sparks numerous questions, including:
The answers to all of these questions are unclear and will almost certainly require clarification through Treasury Regulations and state fiduciary laws. Until then, it is recommended that estate planners reevaluate the use of conduit trusts in their clients’ estate plans and determine if reversing course is necessary.
However, the use of conduit trusts for spouse beneficiaries still appears to be permissible and an effective estate planning strategy. Directing retirement account assets through a conduit trust set up for the benefit of a spouse will still enable the account owner to put spendthrift protections on the retirement account assets and preserve their intended beneficiaries of the account after the death of the surviving spouse (rather than giving the surviving spouse the ability to change the beneficiary to a new spouse, charity, disproportionately among children, or otherwise).
While the most substantial provisions of the SECURE Act are directed toward retirees, retirement account beneficiaries, and retirement plan employer sponsors, a few notable individual income tax provisions made their way into the bill, as well.
The SECURE Act has significantly changed the landscape for financial planning around retirement accounts, both during the lifetime of the owner and in the disposition of their estate. However, every significant change presents new planning opportunities and considerations.
Over the coming months, new planning opportunities surrounding the provisions of the SECURE Act will emerge, and we will get some clarity on how to treat nuanced situations (which, inevitably, will also lead to planning opportunities!).
Given our integration of income and estate tax planning, financial and retirement planning, and investment consulting, our team at Sanderson Wealth Management is uniquely equipped to evaluate how our clients will be impacted by the SECURE Act and to assist our clients in adjusting their financial profiles accordingly.